{"id":3764,"date":"2023-04-13T08:37:09","date_gmt":"2023-04-13T06:37:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.andalucialegal.com\/?p=3764"},"modified":"2023-04-13T08:37:09","modified_gmt":"2023-04-13T06:37:09","slug":"tribunal-constitucional-recurso-de-des-amparo-valor-justicia-valor-arbitrariedad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.andalucialegal.com\/?p=3764","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal Constitucional \u2013 RECURSO DE (Des) &#8211; AMPARO (Valor justicia &amp; valor arbitrariedad)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Lo de hoy va r\u00e1pido, as\u00ed que, que reproduzco la respuesta del Tribunal Constitucional a un Recurso de Amparo presentado por m\u00ed, que adopta la forma de Providencia escueta y concisa.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Los calificativos sobran.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reproduzco la Providencia de inadmisi\u00f3n literalmente, as\u00ed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>&nbsp;{ <\/strong><strong>TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; N\u00ba de recurso: 37-2023<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Sala Primera.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Secci\u00f3n Segunda<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>ASUNTO:<\/strong> Recurso de Amparo promovido <strong>&nbsp; <\/strong>por Enrique Garc\u00eda Montoya.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>PROVIDENCIA &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <\/strong>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Excms. Srs.:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Enr\u00edquez Sancho &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Campo Moreno &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>SOBRE<\/strong>: Auto del \u00a0Juzgado de lo Contencioso Administrativo XX de C\u00f3rdoba en\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0   procedimiento 17\/22.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>La Secci\u00f3n ha examinado el recurso presentado y <strong>ha acordado no admitirlo a tr\u00e1mite por no apreciar en el mismo la especial trascendencia constitucional<\/strong> que, como condici\u00f3n para su admisi\u00f3n, requiere el art. 50.1.b) LOTC (STC 155\/2009, de 25 de junio, FJ 2).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Notif\u00edquese con indicaci\u00f3n de que, si el Ministerio Fiscal no hubiere interpuesto recurso de s\u00faplica en el plazo legal de tres d\u00edas, se archivar\u00e1n estas actuaciones sin m\u00e1s tr\u00e1mite (art. 50.3 LOTC).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Madrid, a once de abril de dos mil veintitr\u00e9s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; PRESIDENTE &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; SECRETARIA DE JUSTICIA &nbsp;<strong>}<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\"><strong><em>Cualquier comentario del contenido de la Providencia sobra, pues el \u201cdesamparo\u201d es patente e injusto.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><u>N.B.<\/u><\/strong>\u00a0Es lo que hay. \u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tengo m\u00e1s, aunque cualquier abogado lo conoce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\"><em>Todos sabemos ya, que el T. C. camina por sendas contrarias al valor justicia, que solo nace del Pueblo.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>C\u00f3rdoba, a 13 de abril de 2023<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fdo. Enrique Garc\u00eda Montoya<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Abogado ICA-C\u00f3rdoba. Inspector de Trabajo y S. S.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lo de hoy va r\u00e1pido, as\u00ed que, que reproduzco la respuesta del Tribunal Constitucional a un Recurso de Amparo presentado por m\u00ed, que adopta la forma de Providencia escueta y concisa. Los calificativos sobran. Reproduzco la Providencia de inadmisi\u00f3n literalmente, as\u00ed: &nbsp;{ TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; N\u00ba de recurso: 37-2023 Sala Primera. Secci\u00f3n Segunda ASUNTO: Recurso [&hellip;]<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[1008,920,1796,1798,473,1526,1797,871,1799,1800,1621,696,1549],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.andalucialegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3764"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.andalucialegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.andalucialegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.andalucialegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.andalucialegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3764"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.andalucialegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3764\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3765,"href":"https:\/\/www.andalucialegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3764\/revisions\/3765"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.andalucialegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.andalucialegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.andalucialegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}